There is always a heated debate that "which is a better way to learn?books? or experience?" it seems that each side has their convincing argument. Those who support books say knowledge in the books is most important while those who support experience despise books. so, who is right? here our journal provides two essays to clear your doubts.
![]() |
| BOOK? |
![]() |
| OR EXPERIENCE? |
賴仕偉
“Then felt I like some watcher of the skies when a new planet swims into his ken.” After reading Chapman’s Homer, John Keats thinks himself as an astronomer who has found a new planet. According to Keats’ poem, we can know that a good book has such a tremendous influence on a person. Surely, books can change a person deeply; but it is experience that has a more direct impact on us. Nevertheless, it doesn’t mean that I suppose the superiority of experience to books. In my opinion, experience and books complement each other and none of them can be absent from our life.
“Then felt I like some watcher of the skies when a new planet swims into his ken.” After reading Chapman’s Homer, John Keats thinks himself as an astronomer who has found a new planet. According to Keats’ poem, we can know that a good book has such a tremendous influence on a person. Surely, books can change a person deeply; but it is experience that has a more direct impact on us. Nevertheless, it doesn’t mean that I suppose the superiority of experience to books. In my opinion, experience and books complement each other and none of them can be absent from our life.
For me, books are the accumulation and
concretization many forerunners’ experiences. When we are reading the books
written by them, we can gain their thoughts, their experiences and even their
worldview. In view of this, sometimes we can prevent ourselves from the danger
that we may get into. What’s more, since the world is too large for us to
travel around, books are exactly a good medium for us to know the outline of
it. However, books may also be obstacles for us sometimes if a person thinks
the contents in them as his whole world. There is a word in Buddhism: “As long
as the Buddhism and its scriptures exist, people can definitely not arrive at
enlightenment without other’s guidance.”
Books have limitations, and that’s the
reason why we still need the experiences gone through by ourselves. Undoubtedly,
we have gained a lot of knowledge from books, but we cannot deny that those
books inevitably include the subjective opinions of their writers. Some authors
only write down what they delight or what they want to write. Therefore, at
this time, an experience is a process which is used to prove and correct the
views we have got from the books and finally reconstruct them to be our own
thoughts. Also, experiencing is the most direct way to contact this world, and
no matter how awful and depressing an experience is, it is still an experience
worth remembering.
So, I suppose we cannot lack either of them,
and both of them do not surpass each other. Truly, we need to experience what
the predecessors have experienced in order not to be confined in other people’s
thoughts and values, and an experience is also a way to reflect what we have
gained from books. However, books are still the foundations when we have to do
something like the authors had gone through before. An experience is a gun
while books are bullets. Without a gun, we cannot shoot out any one of them;
and without bullets, a gun will become useless no matter how sophisticated it
is.
To sum up, whether we prefer experience or
books, we cannot deny the importance of the other. On the one hand, we will
lack basic knowledge and understanding of things if we don’t read books at all.
On the other hand, without experience, we will live in the ivory tower which is
made of other people’s worldview. Therefore, only when the moment we go out to
experience with the knowledge in certain degree, we will be able to act as if
carrying a loaded gun, firing it continuously
宋菀欣
Well
goes the saying “life itself is a constant learning process.” From the cradle
to grave, we keep learning, undergoing a metamorphosis from an ignorant child
to a mature citizen. Nearly everyone agrees that learning is critically
important, but in what way? It seems to be extremely controversial. Some say we
should work hard on academic success. To paraphrase, they think knowledge from
books is better. In contrast, others strongly recommend that we should gain
knowledge from experience, rather than books. As far as I’m concerned, I
believe experience and books are equally important; they are indispensable to
each other.
Both experience and books have the efficacy of gaining knowledge, but the process is slightly different. Experience allows us to engage in an activity personally. In the process, we make, find the mistake, and learning from it. Also, experience will give you a profound lesson that only belongs to you, and you may be able to draw inspiration form it. In contrast, by reading books, we get knowledge from other’s account. These books are timeless wisdom of generations of people. Reading text in the books, absorbing knowledge, we will ultimately change it into our own wisdom. To sum up, both experience and books are ways to learn, broaden our view, and make us mature adults.
However,
some people place too much emphasis on either experience or books. Some of them
firmly believe that only through experience can we fully understand a thing,
while books are less practical and flexible. Therefore, they just constantly
participate in activities, ignoring books. Unlike those who support experience,
other people prefer books. They think that reading books is the best way to
explore the treasury of knowledge whereas experience takes too much time.
As
a matter of fact, the best way to learn is a balanced combination of experience
and books. If one just focuses on books and ignore experience, he or she will
definitely lack the ability to solve problems, and then become a so-called
“nerd”. Actually, although experience is time-consuming, getting some
experience is necessary and worthwhile for those who completely focuses on
books. Similarly, if one puts too much emphasis on experience and doesn’t care
about the knowledge from books, one will see the surface of an event, only to
find that he or she learns little from experience when encountering problems.
Take travelling for example; travelling is a good way to experience charming
local culture; however, a paucity of historical knowledge about this place will
be a hindrance for you to get a deeper insight into the local culture. In other
words, if a professor who specialized in the Maya culture travels to the Macha
Picchu in Peru, he or she will get a deeper understanding into the culture
while we who know nothing about Maya culture will simply be amazed at the
spectacle of Macha Picchu. Only when one thoroughly understands the knowledge
from books can he or she think deeply when one gets into a special situation.
In conclusion, I think it is high time for
everyone to realize that experience and books are equally important, for they
will complement each other, and a balanced combination of experience and books
will infinitely enlarge the effect of learning. By striking a balance between
experience and books, I believe that we will soon become a mature, well-learned
adult.




沒有留言:
張貼留言